This is the mail archive of the java-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the Java project.
| Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
|---|---|---|
| Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |
| Other format: | [Raw text] | |
On Sun, Aug 07, 2005 at 10:36:34AM +0530, Ranjit Mathew wrote:
> Robin Green wrote:
> > This one-liner fixes PR java/23230 by saying "if the inner class has a matching
> > method, don't call a matching method in an outer class." In other words, always
> > use the innermost scope.
> >
> > Tested against libjava/testsuite and jacks - no new failures (or passes). I'll
> > submit a new test case to jacks.
>
> Just to be sure, you did a *clean* build of libjava and then a testsuite
> run with Jacks included, right?
Not quite. I did a clean build, yes, but Jacks was skipped in the testsuite
(because it wasn't on the PATH I assume). However, I ran Jacks myself, and did
"diff -u gcj.log.orig gcj.log". No changes. So I think that is OK.
> Jacks is most likely not the place for such a testcase - AFAICT, they
> only check for compilation success, error or warning.
That's not the case. There are runtime tests as well. It is a JLS test not a
test of any specific API, so it should go in Jacks, I think - but I will
double-check on that when I submit it.
> A better place
> would be the libjava testsuite's "libjava.lang" sub-testsuite. A simple
> testcase that reproduces the problem for me is:
Thanks! My patch works for this test case. Please could you grant me
permission to submit a massaged version of that to Jacks under the GPL.
> ------------------------------- 8< -------------------------------
> class Snafu
> {
> public void whoami( )
> {
> System.out.println( this.getClass( ).getName( ));
> }
> }
>
> public class PR23230 extends Snafu
> {
> class Foo extends Snafu
> {
> Foo( )
> {
> whoami( );
> }
> }
>
> void bar( )
> {
> new Foo( );
> }
>
> public static void main( String[] args)
> {
> new PR23230( ).bar( );
> }
> }
> ------------------------------- 8< -------------------------------
>
> This currently prints "PR23230$Foo" when compiled with Jikes or
> javac, but only prints "PR23230" when compiled with "gcj -C".
>
> Thanks,
> Ranjit.
Regards,
--
Robin
Attachment:
pgp00000.pgp
Description: PGP signature
| Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
|---|---|---|
| Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |