This is the mail archive of the java-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the Java project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: [java/c++/rfc] avoid plt references to cni methods

From: Ian Lance Taylor <ian at airs dot com>
To: Richard Henderson <rth at redhat dot com>
Cc: Andrew Haley <aph at redhat dot com>, java-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org, gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org
Date: 25 May 2005 12:57:17 -0400
Subject: Re: [java/c++/rfc] avoid plt references to cni methods
References: <20050524211342.GA22147@redhat.com><17044.33073.738733.103617@zapata.pink><m31x7v5r5p.fsf@gossamer.airs.com> <20050525165259.GC7280@redhat.com>

Richard Henderson <rth@redhat.com> writes:

> On Wed, May 25, 2005 at 10:14:26AM -0400, Ian Lance Taylor wrote:
> > So using HA is arbitrary but not really more arbitrary than existing
> > code.  Except actually it might be a bit cleaner if it started with
> > 'G' or 'T' rather than 'H'.
> 
> "GA" then?

Works for me.

Ian

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [java/c++/rfc] avoid plt references to cni methods
  - From: Richard Henderson

References:
- [java/c++/rfc] avoid plt references to cni methods
  - From: Richard Henderson
- Re: [java/c++/rfc] avoid plt references to cni methods
  - From: Andrew Haley
- Re: [java/c++/rfc] avoid plt references to cni methods
  - From: Ian Lance Taylor
- Re: [java/c++/rfc] avoid plt references to cni methods
  - From: Richard Henderson

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]