Re: [patch] gjnih

[Thomas Fitzsimmons <fitzsim at redhat dot com>]

On Tue, 2005-05-03 at 17:39 +0100, Andrew Haley wrote:
> Thomas Fitzsimmons writes:
>  > 
>  > 2005-04-30  Thomas Fitzsimmons  <fitzsim@redhat.com>
>  > 
>  > 	PR java/20309
>  > 	* Make-lang.in (java): Add gjnih.
>  > 	(JAVA_TARGET_INDEPENDENT_BIN_TOOLS): Likewise.
>  > 	(GJNIH_OBJS): New variable.
>  > 	(gjnih$(exeext)): New target.
>  > 	(JAVA_MANFILES): Add gjnih.1.
>  > 	(java.uninstall): Add gjnih.1.
>  > 	(java.mostlyclean): Add gjnih.
>  > 	(java.maintainer-clean): Add gjnih.1.
>  > 	(java/gjavah-jni.o): New target.
>  > 	(.INTERMEDIATE): Add gjnih.pod.
>  > 	(gjnih.pod): New target.
>  > 	* config-lang.in (stagestuff): Add gjnih.
>  > 	* gcj.texi (Top): Add gjnih node.
>  > 	(Invoking gcjh): Add descriptions of -force, -old, -trace, -J and
>  > 	-bootclasspath options.
>  > 	(Invoking gjnih): New node.
>  > 	* gjavah.c Initialize flag_jni to 1 if JNI_DEFAULT is defined.
>  > 	(TOOLNAME): New macro.
>  > 	(error): Replace hard-coded gcjh with TOOLNAME.
>  > 	(process_file): Likewise.
>  > 	(usage): Likewise.
>  > 	(version): Likewise.
>  > 	(help): Likewise.  Add help output for -force, -old, -trace and -J
>  > 	options.
>  > 	(OPT_FORCE, OPT_OLD, OPT_TRACE, OPT_J): New macros.
>  > 	(options): Add force, old, trace and J fields.
>  > 	(main): Handle -force, -old, -trace and -J options.
> 
> OK for mainline.
> 

Would this be OK for gcc-4_0-branch as well?  It would be useful to have
there.

Tom

> Andrew.