Re: Patch: test case for PR 21115

[Mark Wielaard <mark at klomp dot org>]

Hi,

On Fri, 2005-04-22 at 07:09 -0700, Anthony Green wrote:
> I think this just means that "." isn't on your CLASSPATH.
>
> libgcj has changed a little recently around this point, hasn't it?

Yes it has. On both the 4.0 branch and current CVS head.
But besides that change/correction of CLASSPATH usage for pre-compiled
binaries you also need a way to make sure the pre-compiled (main) class
is seen as having been loaded by the system class loader (and not by the
null bootstrap class loader). There is a workaround for that second
issue on the 4.0 branch, but this didn't make it into CVS head since it
was felt that we needed a correct fix for this issue and not just a
workaround there:
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/java-patches/2005-q2/msg00100.html

Cheers,

Mark

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part