This is the mail archive of the java-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the Java project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: [RFC PATCH] Don't use ELF weak for entities with vague linkagewhen COMDAT groups are available


Andrew Haley wrote:
Andrew Haley writes:
> Julian Brown writes:
> > > > If people would try this patch and run the testsuite on their machines, > > I'd be grateful. I'd appreciate it if you post information about > > failures which show up for you, with version numbers of binutils bits, > > so I can attempt to track down whatever broke before.
> > This patch breaks indirect dispatch with PIC. With some files, I'm
> now getting errors of the form
> > jacorb.s:9882754: Error: can't resolve `.gnu.linkonce.t._ZN3org3omg21CosNotifyChannelAdmin22_ProxyPushSupplierStub15lifetime_filterEv' {.gnu.linkonce.t._ZN3org3omg21CosNotifyChannelAdmin22_ProxyPushSupplierStub15lifetime_filterEv section} - `.Ltext0' {.text section}


Julian, would you like me to put the testcase somewhere?  Create a PR?
We need this fixed for gcj development to proceed.

Yeah, a testcase might be a good idea (I'm not familiar enough with the Java frontend to be able to reproduce this easily myself, I don't think). Also, could you tell me the platform and binutils versions you are using, in case it's dependent on that?


It's probably best if I revert this part of the patch too, for now, so I'll do that.

Cheers,

Julian


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]