This is the mail archive of the java-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the Java project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: PATCH: [4.1 Regression]: java compiler generates wrong code on ia64

From: Andrew Pinski <pinskia at physics dot uc dot edu>
To: "H. J. Lu" <hjl at lucon dot org>
Cc: Mark Mitchell <mark at codesourcery dot com>, mckinlay at redhat dot com, gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org, java-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org
Date: Sun, 17 Apr 2005 23:33:13 -0400
Subject: Re: PATCH: [4.1 Regression]: java compiler generates wrong code on ia64
References: <20050417191125.GA29627@lucon.org> <4262B72F.6020400@codesourcery.com> <20050418033125.GA3890@lucon.org>

On Apr 17, 2005, at 11:31 PM, H. J. Lu wrote:

make_local_function_alias is introduced in

http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/java-patches/2004-q3/msg00618.html
Is there a testcase to show it is really needed? I'd like to run it
on ia32, x86_64 and ia64 to verify its usage.

This was done so that Java code could avoid GOT code.

-- Pinski

Follow-Ups:
- Re: PATCH: [4.1 Regression]: java compiler generates wrong code on ia64
  - From: H. J. Lu

References:
- PATCH: [4.1 Regression]: java compiler generates wrong code on ia64
  - From: H. J. Lu
- Re: PATCH: [4.1 Regression]: java compiler generates wrong code onia64
  - From: Mark Mitchell
- Re: PATCH: [4.1 Regression]: java compiler generates wrong code on ia64
  - From: H. J. Lu

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]