This is the mail archive of the java-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the Java project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: [Patch] Fix Socket read returns EOF when count == 0...


On Tue, Mar 15, 2005 at 08:58:09AM -0800, David Daney wrote:
> Michael Koch wrote:
> >On Mon, Mar 14, 2005 at 04:16:54PM -0800, David Daney wrote:
> >>Tom Tromey wrote:
> >>>>>>>>"David" == David Daney <ddaney@avtrex.com> writes:
> >>>David> Tested on the HEAD on i686-pc-linux with make check in libjava with no
> >>>David> regressions.  No regressions in mauve in the 4.0 branch (HEAD not
> >>>David> tested in mauve due to ICE in mauve)
> >>>David> 2005-03-14  David Daney  <ddaney@avtrex.com>
> >>>David> 	* gnu/java/net/natPlainSocketImplPosix.cc (read_helper): Handle
> >>>David> 	count == 0 case.
> >>>David> O.K to commit to HEAD?
> >>>David> How about the 4.0 branch for good measure?
> >>>Yes to both.  Thanks.
> >>>FWIW I think the Win32 code needs this as well.
> >>FWIW I don't currently have a mandate to fix/test Win32 things (x86-linux is pushing it).
> >I think it falls under the obvious rule in this case.
> 
> It may be obvious, but my understanding of the 'obvious' rule as it applies to code is that the All-patches-must-be-thoroughly-tested rule still applies.
> 
> I will not be testing Win32 code so it seems that I should not be committing random changes to it either.

Then please file at least a bug for it so it dont gets forgotten.


Michael
-- 
Java Trap: http://www.gnu.org/philosophy/java-trap.html


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]