Re: [Patch] the big cleanup merge

[Michael Koch <konqueror at gmx dot de>]

On Thu, Feb 17, 2005 at 10:34:05AM +0100, Mark Wielaard wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> On Thu, 2005-02-17 at 09:15 -0600, Michael Koch wrote:
> > > Thanks. I see that this patch mixes gui and non-gui stuff.
> > > Does this mean the gui branch is officially dead now and that we can
> > > officially merge in bug fixes from GNU Classpath CVS directly into the
> > > trunk whithout having to go through the gui branch first?
> > 
> > For me it is. I know I'm selfish in this regard. :-)
> 
> Hmmm. I don't like screwing with other people there patch/merge flow.
> Could we have an active decission about this?
> I would very much support the dead of the gui-branch (at least while we
> are all working toward the big 4.0 branch and resyncing with GNU
> Classpath CVS is in progress).

Wasnt the decision already made on IRC ? That was my opinion. Of course
this has to be announced on the list.

> > > BTW. It really helps if you use the exact same ChangeLog message when
> > > you merge stuff.
> >
> > Normally I do but in this case it doesnt help much. No real code change
> > happened. And it don't exactly matched the patches for GNU classpath as
> > some things were already in GCC and some stuff was already in GNU
> > classpath before.
> 
> OK. Thanks. Does that mean all the cleanup/formatting fixes from GNU
> Classpath from yesterday are now in or do you anticipate reformatting
> other source files in the near future? Asking so I can avoid working on
> merging real code changes to such classes for now.

There are still some little differences between classpath and gcc in
this area. I will merge them. You can concentrate on real code changes.

We should speak later on IRC to coordinate our efforts a bit.


Michael