This is the mail archive of the java-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the Java project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

PR java/15543: Fix SEGFAULT in jv-scan (Was: Re: Whither jv-scan?)

From: Ranjit Mathew <rmathew at gmail dot com>
To: tromey at redhat dot com
Cc: GCJ Patches <java-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org>, GCC Patches <gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org>
Date: Wed, 2 Feb 2005 13:10:10 +0530
Subject: PR java/15543: Fix SEGFAULT in jv-scan (Was: Re: Whither jv-scan?)
References: <ctl3iq$2sj$1@sea.gmane.org> <m38y69jqxi.fsf@localhost.localdomain>
Reply-to: Ranjit Mathew <rmathew at gmail dot com>

On 31 Jan 2005 13:15:37 -0700, Tom Tromey <tromey@redhat.com> wrote:
> Ranjit>   Who uses jv-scan? Why was it created?
> 
> The test suite uses it to find the 'main' of a program.  This is lame.
> On the gcjx branch I already deleted jv-scan (but I haven't fixed the
> test suite yet).  This program is buggy (there is at least one PR for
> a crash), is not maintained, and IMO is not really very useful.

The PR was rather trivial to fix as was the input-
filename-being-null problem (leeched from jcf-parse.c, 
but not converted for USE_MAPPED_LOCATION).

Tested on i686-pc-linux-gnu.

OK for mainline?

Ranjit.

-- 
Ranjit Mathew      Email: rmathew AT gmail DOT com

Bangalore, INDIA.    Web: http://ranjitmathew.hostingzero.com/

Attachment: jvscan.txt
Description: Text document

Follow-Ups:
- Re: PR java/15543: Fix SEGFAULT in jv-scan (Was: Re: Whither jv-scan?)
  - From: Andrew Haley

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]