This is the mail archive of the java-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the Java project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: PR java/9157: ICE on malformed ?: condition

From: Ranjit Mathew <rmathew at gmail dot com>
To: GCJ Patches <java-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org>
Cc: GCC Patches <gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org>
Date: Tue, 1 Feb 2005 07:58:04 +0530
Subject: Re: PR java/9157: ICE on malformed ?: condition
References: <41FE4381.4050108@gmail.com> <16894.18362.609094.629909@cuddles.cambridge.redhat.com>
Reply-to: Ranjit Mathew <rmathew at gmail dot com>

On Mon, 31 Jan 2005 14:59:06 +0000, Andrew Haley <aph@redhat.com> wrote:

>  >      PR java/9157
>  >      * parse.y (build_string_concatenation): Remove redundant if.
>  >      (patch_conditional_expr): Attempt to patch_string() the condition
>  >      of a ?: as well, in addition to its other operands.
> 
> OK.

Thanks. I've committed the patch with the following
minor change to the comment preceding the interesting
hunk:

  /* The condition and operands of ?: might be StringBuffers crafted
     as a result of a string concatenation.  Obtain decent ones here.  */

I have also punted on the ICE v/s "normal" fail for
the testsuite - it looks beyond me (for the moment). :-/

Thanks,
Ranjit.

-- 
Ranjit Mathew      Email: rmathew AT gmail DOT com

Bangalore, INDIA.    Web: http://ranjitmathew.hostingzero.com/

References:
- PR java/9157: ICE on malformed ?: condition
  - From: Ranjit Mathew
- Re: PR java/9157: ICE on malformed ?: condition
  - From: Andrew Haley

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]