This is the mail archive of the java-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the Java project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: [PATCH] Fix pr16789 failures on the SPARC

From: Eric Botcazou <ebotcazou at libertysurf dot fr>
To: tromey at redhat dot com
Cc: java-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org
Date: Tue, 4 Jan 2005 22:54:53 +0100
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Fix pr16789 failures on the SPARC
References: <200501032135.12009.ebotcazou@libertysurf.fr> <m3llb9gctx.fsf@localhost.localdomain>

> Thanks, this looks good.  I wonder if it can go in at the moment... I
> do think it is an important fix, but is it a regression?

I personally think that all new failures in the regression testsuite should be 
treated as regressions (pr16789 is a new failure both on SPARC/Solaris and 
SPARC/Linux).  Otherwise this would become seriously messy.  That said, if you 
want me to run this by Mark...

-- 
Eric Botcazou

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [PATCH] Fix pr16789 failures on the SPARC
  - From: Bryce McKinlay

References:
- [PATCH] Fix pr16789 failures on the SPARC
  - From: Eric Botcazou
- Re: [PATCH] Fix pr16789 failures on the SPARC
  - From: Tom Tromey

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]