Re: Patch: RFA: Fix PR java/14853

[Andrew Haley <aph at redhat dot com>]

Tom Tromey writes:
 > >>>>> "Andrew" == Andrew Haley <aph@redhat.com> writes:
 > 
 > Andrew> Eeeeh, OK.  This is nasty stuff.
 > 
 > Yeah.  I really dislike how gcj builds different trees up front
 > depending on flag_emit_class_files and flag_syntax_only (and other
 > things, like enable_assertions).
 > 
 > Here's the revision of the patch as we discussed on irc.
 > Instead of stripping in an ad hoc way, we now use a function that
 > already existed for doing this.  It is renamed since we both disliked
 > the old name.
 > 
 > Ok?
 > 
 > Tom
 > 
 > Index: gcc/java/ChangeLog
 > from  Tom Tromey  <tromey@redhat.com>
 > 
 > 	PR java/14853:
 > 	* java-tree.h (extract_field_decl): Declare.
 > 	* parse.y (extract_field_decl): Renamed from
 > 	strip_out_static_field_access_decl.  No longer static.
 > 	* check-init.c (get_variable_decl): Unwrap COMPOUND_EXPRs.

Yes, that's better.

Andrew.