RE: [PATCH] boehm gc support for CRIS

["Boehm, Hans" <hans dot boehm at hp dot com>]

I finally put this into my source trees.  It will show up in GC6.4
and later, and in 7.0alpha2 and later.  I made the changes suggested
below.

I did not check this into gcc, but that would be a good idea, if it
hasn't been done.

(The 7.0alpha2 version will probably require some work when we get
there.  I tried, but I probably broke something.)

Hans

> -----Original Message-----
> From: java-patches-owner@gcc.gnu.org
> [mailto:java-patches-owner@gcc.gnu.org]On Behalf Of Hans-Peter Nilsson
> Sent: Friday, October 29, 2004 4:01 AM
> To: Boehm, Hans
> Cc: simon.posnjak@cetrtapot.si; hans-peter.nilsson@axis.com;
> tromey@redhat.com; rmathew@gmail.com; green@redhat.com;
> java-patches@gcc.gnu.org
> Subject: Re: [PATCH] boehm gc support for CRIS
> 
> 
> > From: Simon Posnjak <simon.posnjak@cetrtapot.si>
> > Date: Fri, 29 Oct 2004 10:00:04 +0200
> 
> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
> > Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
> > 
> > V Ä?et, 28.10.2004 ob 21:08 je Boehm, Hans napisal(a):
> > > In that case, I'm basically fine with the patch.
> > > 
> > > Simon - Can you resubmit the patch with the small change from
> > > CRIS32 to CRIS?  That will reduce the chance of a misapplication
> > > on my part, or divergence between the gcc and my trees.
> > Attached.
> 
> When this is applied to the master GC sources, is there any
> chance of also fixing:
> 
> The misspelling in the gc_locks.h part of the patch?  "Riped" ->
> "Ripped".
> 
> The comment above the asm needs updating too; it refers to a
> variable "spinlock" which here is "addr".
> 
> Thanks!
> 
> brgds, H-P
> PS. If you'd rather have an updated patch, I can do that.
>