This is the mail archive of the java-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the Java project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: Patch: RFC: new verifier integration


Index: ChangeLog
from  Tom Tromey  <tromey@redhat.com>

	* decl.c (check_local_unnamed_variable): Recognize
	promoted-to-int parameters when using the new verifier.
	* expr.c (expand_java_arraystore): Explicitly request array type
	when using new verifier.
	(expand_java_arrayload): Likewise.
	(invoke_build_dtable): Don't pass object_type_node as
	expression argument to build_java_indirect_ref.
	(build_java_check_indexed_type): Do nothing.
	(build_java_arraystore_check): Handle case where array doesn't
	have array type.
	(build_java_array_length_access): Likewise.
	(expand_invoke): Handle case where interface overrides a method
	from Object.
	(pop_type_0): Always succeed for reference types.
	(process_jvm_instruction): Don't pop a value in a dead
	exception handler.
	(pop_arguments): Convert arguments to correct types.


This looks right.  Per the branhc rules, it should go to gcc-patches
too.

I don't like "flag_new_verifier".  Will it be the new verifier forever?

Andrew.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]