This is the mail archive of the java-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the Java project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: Committed: Fix C99:ism (declaration after statement) in javaFE.

From: Hans-Peter Nilsson <hp at bitrange dot com>
To: "Kaveh R. Ghazi" <ghazi at caip dot rutgers dot edu>
Cc: gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org, java-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org
Date: Sun, 17 Oct 2004 06:59:09 -0400 (EDT)
Subject: Re: Committed: Fix C99:ism (declaration after statement) in javaFE.
References: <Pine.BSF.4.58.0410161427440.88859@dair.pair.com><200410170237.i9H2b6B3012334@caip.rutgers.edu>

On Sat, 16 Oct 2004, Kaveh R. Ghazi wrote:
>  > Hope to look into adding -Wdeclaration-after-statement for all
>  > front-ends @WERROR@ settings (stage2 or where supported).
>
> No need for a new flag, just add -pedantic like the other FEs do.
> (Haven't tried it myself, probably requires cleaning other fallout.)

Hmm, looks like you're right.  Tom Tromey mentioned on IRC that
he'd like more warnings enabled, so it seems this would be the
way to go.  Maybe I'll do it.

brgds, H-P

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Committed: Fix C99:ism (declaration after statement) in java FE.
  - From: Steven Bosscher

References:
- Committed: Fix C99:ism (declaration after statement) in java FE.
  - From: Hans-Peter Nilsson
- Re: Committed: Fix C99:ism (declaration after statement) in java FE.
  - From: Kaveh R. Ghazi

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]