This is the mail archive of the java-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the Java project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: URL.toString

From: Guilhem Lavaux <guilhem at kaffe dot org>
To: Andrew Pinski <pinskia at physics dot uc dot edu>
Cc: Ken Larson <kendotlarson at mindspring dot com>,java-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org
Date: Tue, 20 Apr 2004 13:58:50 +0200
Subject: Re: URL.toString
References: <4085076C.6010605@mindspring.com> <5AD469E1-92BE-11D8-9A14-000393A6D2F2@physics.uc.edu>

On Tue, 2004-04-20 at 13:32, Andrew Pinski wrote:
> On Apr 20, 2004, at 07:20, Ken Larson wrote:
> 
> > Hi, I'm a bit of newbie to gcj, I'm not at the point where I'm 
> > actually supposed to submit bugs, hopefully this is it.
> >
> > I've been trying to get my project to work with gcj, and along the way 
> > I've been finding a few places where gcj's behavior deviates from 
> > standard Java.  This is from compiling the source code to binary... 
> > I've noticed that the results are sometimes different if you compile a 
> > .class file to binary instead.
> 
> I think you just found PR 6298 again.
> http://gcc.gnu.org/PR6298
> 

This bug is fixed by my today's patch on GNU Classpath
(authority/userInfo patch).

I am waiting for a review.

Cheers,

Guilhem.

References:
- URL.toString
  - From: Ken Larson
- Re: URL.toString
  - From: Andrew Pinski

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]