This is the mail archive of the
java-patches@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the Java project.
Re: Patch: replace mutex with object synchronization
- From: Tom Tromey <tromey at redhat dot com>
- To: Bryce McKinlay <mckinlay at redhat dot com>
- Cc: Anthony Green <green at redhat dot com>, java-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Date: 13 Apr 2004 14:08:58 -0600
- Subject: Re: Patch: replace mutex with object synchronization
- References: <1078112239.3462.567.camel@escape> <407AB4A9.5060000@redhat.com>
- Reply-to: tromey at redhat dot com
Bryce> I guess it doesn't matter right now, since libgcj itself isn't
Bryce> built with the BC-ABI, but eventually, using Java locks here
Bryce> could potentially lead to circularity problems.
I suspect there will always be a few classes we don't compile with the
BC ABI. Object, maybe Class and String too. This seems like an area
we need to experiment with once the patches are in.
Tom