This is the mail archive of the
java-patches@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the Java project.
Re: [PATCH] [POSIX]: SocketTimeoutException for PlainDatagramSocketImpl + Minor Case Changes
- From: Michael Koch <konqueror at gmx dot de>
- To: Mohan Embar <gnustuff at thisiscool dot com>
- Cc: Michael Koch <konqueror at gmx dot de>, GCJ Patches <java-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org>
- Date: Mon, 15 Dec 2003 16:11:25 +0100
- Subject: Re: [PATCH] [POSIX]: SocketTimeoutException for PlainDatagramSocketImpl + Minor Case Changes
- References: <20031215150512.GA783@mail.konqueror.de> <BFAQLGEJGPJ2193KHXVC7434YD8HSM.3fddce40@p733>
On Mon, Dec 15, 2003 at 09:07:44AM -0600, Mohan Embar wrote:
> Hi Michael,
>
> >Personally I like it more in lowercase. Bryce seems to like the
> >capitalised versions more. We should at least get consistent in classes
> >(better in whole packages, even better in whole libgcj/classpath). We
> >have no general rule (yet ?) and I will accept patches to
> >java.net/java.nio to make them conform to one standard. (I will not
> >accpet them if they are changing this forth and back ;-)).
> >
> >BTW: I get this under the obvious rule and this needs no explicite
> >approve.
>
> So I'm still not clear on whether you want me to check this
> in as-is, make this all-uppercase, all-lowercase, or wait for
> some sort of consensus....
The consensus would be best but I'm okay whatever you do in this
direction. Please just stay consistent.
Michael