This is the mail archive of the
java-patches@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the Java project.
Re: Patch for review: java.lang.Class - signers issue
Michael Koch writes:
> On Wed, Dec 03, 2003 at 02:17:28PM +0000, Andrew Haley wrote:
> > Michael Koch writes:
> > > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> > > Hash: SHA1
> > >
> > >
> > > I wrote the attached two patches to make it possible to compile
> > > classpath with gcj again. I see these patches as start for a
> > > discussion of this problem. These patches fix PR/12768 which is a
> > > regression from 3.3.
> >
> > Tom wanted to call the field hack_signers. I don't know why. I would
> > have thought _Jv_signers a better choice. However, this should be
> > good enough for 3.4.
>
> Tom said that the renaming to hack_signers is only a temporary solution
> for 3.4.
I read that. I still don't know why hack_signers is a suitable name.
> In fact someone should implement a better solution for this
> problem. My fixes are just a workaround.
OK. You'll need to post the compiler part to gcc-patches.
Andrew.