This is the mail archive of the java-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the Java project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: Patch: java.net.URLStreamHandler

From: Bryce McKinlay <bryce at mckinlay dot net dot nz>
To: Mark Wielaard <mark at klomp dot org>
Cc: java-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org
Date: Wed, 29 Oct 2003 11:09:12 +1300
Subject: Re: Patch: java.net.URLStreamHandler
References: <Pine.LNX.4.44.0310281550260.17014-100000@ops2.one-point.com> <1067378075.21761.22.camel@localhost>

On Oct 29, 2003, at 10:54 AM, Mark Wielaard wrote:

IMHO the comment should also have been killed at the time of
merging with classpath.
Why? The comment explains observed behaviour of another implementation which we think is not according to spec. I think it is helpfull since it explains the rational we use for not following this behaviour.

Oops, my apologies - I didn't read the first line of the comment. A URL with a port number but no host probably isn't a valid URL. Might as well follow the JRE behaviour in that case, but I have no strong opinion.

Regards

Bryce.

References:
- Re: Patch: java.net.URLStreamHandler
  - From: Jeff Sturm
- Re: Patch: java.net.URLStreamHandler
  - From: Mark Wielaard

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]