This is the mail archive of the
java-patches@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the Java project.
Re: FYI: Patch: java.net.URL
- From: Michael Koch <konqueror at gmx dot de>
- To: Bryce McKinlay <bryce at mckinlay dot net dot nz>
- Cc: java-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Date: Fri, 3 Oct 2003 09:35:44 +0200
- Subject: Re: FYI: Patch: java.net.URL
- References: <73756198-F55C-11D7-8390-003065F97F7C@mckinlay.net.nz>
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Am Freitag, 3. Oktober 2003 06:45 schrieb Bryce McKinlay:
> On Friday, Oct 3, 2003, at 00:17 Pacific/Auckland, Michael Koch
wrote:
> > I commited the attached patch to trunk. It cleans up java.net.URL
> > to a state where I think further merging with classpath isn't
> > useful. Others may have other opinions and should share them with
> > the rest of us.
>
> I can't see any real reason why URL can't be completely merged,
> eventually. But, from reading the comments, it does sound like
> there might be some tricky issues for libgcj.
Well, file protocol handler exists in classpath too. That could be
merged if needed/wanted. core protocol handler doesnt exist in
classpath.
> > + private static final String DEFAULT_SEARCH_PATH =
> > + "gnu.java.net.protocol|sun.net.www.protocol";
> > +
>
> What is sun.net.www.protocol? I don't think we want it!
I dont know. I was in URL.java before I startet merging.
Michael
- --
Homepage: http://www.worldforge.org/
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.3 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQE/fSbVWSOgCCdjSDsRAg10AKCcdMq/+05rnx1rSg6FZ1fjo6wRrQCfbJ/F
j2LsUrBvG95rUcSi5vprgWk=
=Kdrk
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----