Re: java.rmi.server patch

["Frank Ch. Eigler" <fche at redhat dot com>]

Hi -


> [...]
> For the test suite, the ideal would be that you add a new Mauve test
> case.  I can give you Mauve write access if you like.

I'll take a peek to see to what extent RMI might be easily tested.

> Mark Wielaard pointed out on irc that there's a patch in the same
> area in Classpath.  Could you look at it and advise?
> http://gcc.gnu.org/java/compare/java.rmi.server.RMIClassLoader.diff

Assuming the "-" side of the diff is the new version, looks okay.
How strict are you (classpath + libjava) trying to be with matching
the signature of Sun java.* functions, with respect to "throws"
clauses?

> We've been a bit lax on merging Classpath changes back into libgcj
> recently.

If they are the upstream source for this neighbourhood, would it have
been more appropriate for me to submit my patch to classpath
first/instead, and then merge?


- FChE

Attachment: pgp00000.pgp
Description: PGP signature