This is the mail archive of the
java-patches@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the Java project.
Re: Patch: java.net win32 - removing unused code
Mohan Embar writes:
> Hi Michael,
>
> >I would like to commit the attached patch to trunk. It removes the
> >code enclosed by the DISABLE_JAVA_NET defines. This code is unused
> >because when --disable-java-net is specified these files are not used
> >during build time (then the *NoNet.cc versions are used).
>
> THE PROBLEM
>
> As we talked about before, I have already done this (and much, much more)
> here:
>
> http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/java-patches/2003-q3/msg00111.html
>
> But this patch is in a wait state pending this one:
>
> http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/java-patches/2003-q3/msg00390.html
>
> ...which Bryce said he is okay with with one exception:
>
> http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/java-patches/2003-q3/msg00391.html
>
> ...but for which I am getting discrepancies with his theory as to
> which is faster:
>
> http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/java-patches/2003-q3/msg00392.html
>
> :( :( :(
It doesn't matter. Check it in.
> I would also need to reconcile the cleanup patch with this one:
>
> http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/java-patches/2003-q3/msg00283.html
>
> MOHAN'S PRESCRIPTION
>
> - someone approve these two as-is:
>
> - http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/java-patches/2003-q3/msg00283.html
> - http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/java-patches/2003-q3/msg00390.html
>
> We can always quibble about whether we use _Jv_AllocBytes()
> or _Jv_Malloc() later.
>
> - then I redo this in terms of the above two and resubmit:
>
> - http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/java-patches/2003-q3/msg00111.html
>
> - then someone approves the above
>
> - then I can check these in and DISABLE_JAVA_NET will be
> gone forever. I'd need to slightly modify my cleanup patch
> before checking it in.
Go ahead.
Andrew.