This is the mail archive of the java-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the Java project.
Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
---|---|---|
Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |
Other format: | [Raw text] |
Hi Patch People, I'm booting this thing out of the nest even though I haven't created an exhaustive test for it. (I've done pretty decent ad hoc testing and if I don't push this out now, I'll procrastinate on this even longer. It's an order of magnitude better than what's there already - consider it one of those drugs that the US Food and Drug Administration rushes to market before they've done exhaustive clinical testing....) See the previous post for an explanation of what this does: http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/java-patches/2003-q2/msg00567.html To reiterate: this only touches MingW-specific files. I've split out Ranjit's os.arch and process quoting patches from this one. In a separate post, I'll indicate what patches need to be applied to MingW gcj in what order. With this patch, I believe that the MingW code would show a higher degree of JRE conformance than the current POSIX net code because some sections are erroneously throwing InterruptedIOExceptions instead of SocketTimeoutExceptions. I've discussed this with Michael informally, but will follow up on this more formally later. The next thing I'll try to do is right a more exhaustive test suite that, while not Mauve-compliant, will be something where you can hopefully nicely diff against the JRE output of the same test. I've compressed this because it's 99k unzipped. -- Mohan http://www.thisiscool.com/ http://www.animalsong.org/
Attachment:
w32c6.tar.bz2
Description: application/bzip2
Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
---|---|---|
Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |