This is the mail archive of the
java-patches@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the Java project.
Re: _Jv_CallAnyMehtodA alignment patch
- From: Tom Tromey <tromey at redhat dot com>
- To: "Boehm, Hans" <hans_boehm at hp dot com>
- Cc: "'Andrew Haley'" <aph at redhat dot com>, "'java-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org '" <java-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org>
- Date: 10 Feb 2003 16:50:49 -0700
- Subject: Re: _Jv_CallAnyMehtodA alignment patch
- References: <75A9FEBA25015040A761C1F74975667DA13682@hplex4.hpl.hp.com>
- Reply-to: tromey at redhat dot com
>>>>> "Hans" == Boehm, Hans <hans_boehm@hp.com> writes:
Hans> (Unfortunately, it takes a few awt patches to get to this stage.
Hans> I would like to see those, or corrected versions of them, make
Hans> it into the tree as well.)
No problem. I'm glad you've looked at this.
Hans> I think this should show up if you try to pass a byte as the
Hans> first argument and a long as the second argument to a JNI
Hans> method. It looks like there are no such cases in the test
Hans> suite. The gtk peers seem to be by far the most demanding JNI
Hans> test we have?
That's definitely true. The tests in testsuite/libjava.jni/ are
pretty minimal.
Could you write a new one? If not, and if I write a new one, could
you test it?
Tom