This is the mail archive of the java-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the Java project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: Patch: gcj and rhug build regression

From: Tom Tromey <tromey at redhat dot com>
To: Andrew Haley <aph at redhat dot com>
Cc: Java Patch List <java-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org>, Gcc Patch List <gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org>
Date: 29 Jan 2003 11:42:51 -0700
Subject: Re: Patch: gcj and rhug build regression
References: <87n0lkr7as.fsf@fleche.redhat.com><15927.45068.386247.482731@cuddles.cambridge.redhat.com><87el6vrems.fsf@fleche.redhat.com><15928.8375.932612.265726@cuddles.cambridge.redhat.com>
Reply-to: tromey at redhat dot com

>>>>> "Andrew" == Andrew Haley <aph@redhat.com> writes:

Andrew> So flag-syntax-only is probably a better choice than
Andrew> flag_emit_class_files, since it works in both cases.

I'm leaving it as-is, since the bug only occurs when generating bytecode.
The optimized code will work fine for syntax-only.
If you really want me to change it, tell me and I will.

Tom

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Patch: gcj and rhug build regression
  - From: Andrew Haley

References:
- Patch: gcj and rhug build regression
  - From: Tom Tromey
- Patch: gcj and rhug build regression
  - From: Andrew Haley
- Re: Patch: gcj and rhug build regression
  - From: Tom Tromey
- Re: Patch: gcj and rhug build regression
  - From: Andrew Haley

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]