Re: Updated throwable and stacktrace printing patch

[Tom Tromey <tromey at redhat dot com>]

>>>>> "Andrew" == Andrew Haley <aph@cambridge.redhat.com> writes:

Andrew> Some programmers may not be interested in gory details, but
Andrew> others are.  For us to presume that a heavily obfuscated stack
Andrew> trace is an appropriate default is IMO unjustified.

I don't have an opinion on the issue this directly refers to.  But I
did want to point out that in one case we definitely want to change
the stack trace.  That case is when there is an interpreted frame on
the stack.  In this case we should print information about what we're
interpreting, not about the interpreter itself.

Tom