This is the mail archive of the java-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the Java project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: Throwable stack trace printing again

From: Per Bothner <per at bothner dot com>
To: Andrew Haley <aph at cambridge dot redhat dot com dot bothner dot com>
Cc: Mark Wielaard <mark at klomp dot org>, java-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org
Date: Mon, 29 Jul 2002 10:47:05 -0700
Subject: Re: Throwable stack trace printing again
References: <1027719277.1819.54.camel@elsschot> <15685.30002.216505.831464@cuddles.cambridge.redhat.com>

Andrew Haley wrote:

I think it's fair enough to store the raw stack trace as an unsigned
long but you're using a jlong.  AFAIK conversion from signed longs to
pointers is not well-defined, bvut in practice this will probably
always be okay.  Clearly there's no Java type that corresponds to a
native pointer.

We could perhaps use gnu.gcj.RawData.
--
	--Per Bothner
per@bothner.com   http://www.bothner.com/per/

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Throwable stack trace printing again
  - From: Andrew Haley

References:
- Throwable stack trace printing again
  - From: Mark Wielaard
- Throwable stack trace printing again
  - From: Andrew Haley

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]