This is the mail archive of the
java-patches@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the Java project.
Re: -shared-libgcc vs. -static -static-libgcc
- From: Benjamin Kosnik <bkoz at redhat dot com>
- To: Alexandre Oliva <aoliva at redhat dot com>
- Cc: gcc dot gnu dot org at redhat dot lsd dot ic dot unicamp dot br, gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org, libstdc++-v3 at gcc dot gnu dot org, java-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Date: Wed, 27 Feb 2002 20:18:02 -0800 (PST)
- Subject: Re: -shared-libgcc vs. -static -static-libgcc
> There's little point in cluttering the top-level configure.in with
> such an internal detail of libstdc++-v3 and libjava. I should have
> realized this upfront. While at that, I went ahead and removed the
> assumption that libjava depends on libstdc++-v3 from libstdcxx_flags,
> as I suggested in another thread.
Great.
> As co-maintainer of configury stuff, I could have checked in most of
> this in, and the problem would be solved, but I thought I'd check it
> in as a unit, which means I have to wait for approval for the change
> in gcc.c. Ok to install?
This is fine with me. Please make sure this gets into gcc-3_1_branch as
well as mainline.
thanks,
benjamin