This is the mail archive of the
java-patches@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the Java project.
Re: Patch for --version output
- From: Toon Moene <toon at moene dot indiv dot nluug dot nl>
- To: "Joseph S. Myers" <jsm28 at cam dot ac dot uk>
- Cc: gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org, java-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Date: Thu, 31 Jan 2002 20:13:32 +0100
- Subject: Re: Patch for --version output
- Organization: Moene Computational Physics, Maartensdijk, The Netherlands
- References: <Pine.LNX.4.33.0201311842500.18228-100000@kern.srcf.societies.cam.ac.uk>
"Joseph S. Myers" wrote:
> Note (Fortran): though g77 now follows what the GNU Coding Standards
> say is the correct format where a program has its own version
> different from the overall package's version, does g77, only now
> distributed as an integrated part of GCC, really still need its own
> version?
It's fine with me if you remove the separate Fortran version number. On
my list for 3.1 is to remove all references to a future "0.6" version
and all the beautiful things it would offer ....
--
Toon Moene - mailto:toon@moene.indiv.nluug.nl - phoneto: +31 346 214290
Saturnushof 14, 3738 XG Maartensdijk, The Netherlands
Maintainer, GNU Fortran 77: http://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/g77_news.html
Join GNU Fortran 95: http://g95.sourceforge.net/ (under construction)