This is the mail archive of the java-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the Java project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: Patch: this$<n> initialization -vs- verification

From: Tom Tromey <tromey at redhat dot com>
To: Eric Blake <ebb9 at email dot byu dot edu>
Cc: Gcc Patch List <gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org>, Java Patch List <java-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org>
Date: 09 Dec 2001 18:07:36 -0700
Subject: Re: Patch: this$<n> initialization -vs- verification
References: <87zo4t9jdx.fsf@creche.redhat.com> <3C12EBEF.4310FFC1@email.byu.edu> <87n10t7zlx.fsf@creche.redhat.com> <3C12F0C5.6D93B5E2@email.byu.edu>
Reply-to: tromey at redhat dot com

>>>>> "Eric" == Eric Blake <ebb9@email.byu.edu> writes:

Eric> That's from the 2nd edition, published in 99, available online and for
Eric> download at
Eric> http://java.sun.com/docs/books/vmspec/index.html

Thanks.  I read this and I agree with you -- my patch is unnecessary.
I withdraw it.

I've modified the gij verifier to handle this case.  I'll check in the
patch soon.

Tom

References:
- Patch: this$<n> initialization -vs- verification
  - From: Tom Tromey
- Re: Patch: this$<n> initialization -vs- verification
  - From: Eric Blake
- Re: Patch: this$<n> initialization -vs- verification
  - From: Tom Tromey
- Re: Patch: this$<n> initialization -vs- verification
  - From: Eric Blake

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]