This is the mail archive of the
java-patches@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the Java project.
RE: cygwin patch for libjava/configure.in
- To: "'tromey at redhat dot com'" <tromey at redhat dot com>
- Subject: RE: cygwin patch for libjava/configure.in
- From: "Billinghurst, David (CRTS)" <David dot Billinghurst at riotinto dot com>
- Date: Thu, 2 Aug 2001 23:16:23 -0000
- Cc: "'gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org'" <gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org>, "'java-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org'" <java-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org>, "'robert dot collins at itdomain dot com dot au'" <robert dot collins at itdomain dot com dot au>
I was wrong, but as I was checking for the absence of the structure I didn't
detect the typo. The code in the trunk should work fine in cygwin.
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Tom Tromey [SMTP:tromey@redhat.com]
> Sent: Friday, 3 August 2001 3:34
> To: Billinghurst, David (CRTS)
> Cc: 'gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org'; 'java-patches@gcc.gnu.org';
> 'robert.collins@itdomain.com.au'
> Subject: Re: cygwin patch for libjava/configure.in
>
> >>>>> "David" == Billinghurst, David (CRTS)
> <David.Billinghurst@riotinto.com> writes:
>
> Another ancient patch resurrected...
>
> David> This patch addresses two issues in libjava:
> David> * posix threads on cygwin doesn't/can't link with -lpthreads.
>
> I've updated this part to match the 3.1 sources and I'm going to check
> it in.
>
> David> * autoconf detects IP6 but cygwin implementation is incomplete
>
> David> I have changed the IP6 detection to use another struct defined
> David> in RFC2133. It may be safer to look for both structs with
> David> something like
>
> Rainer Orth recently committed some code in this area. His code
> checks for `struct ipv6_mreq', whereas yours used `struct ip6_mreq'
> (no `v').
>
> Was that a typo on your part? Will the code currently in the trunk
> work (in this area) on Cygwin?
>
> Tom