This is the mail archive of the java-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the Java project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]

Re: PATCH: java: suppress java.lang.Object constructor

To: Jeff Sturm <jsturm at one-point dot com>
Subject: Re: PATCH: java: suppress java.lang.Object constructor
From: Alexandre Petit-Bianco <apbianco at cygnus dot com>
Date: Fri, 13 Jul 2001 14:53:43 -0700 (PDT)
Cc: java-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org, gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org
References: <15183.24081.245039.222300@fencer.cygnus.com><Pine.LNX.4.10.10107131917501.3953-100000@mars.deadcafe.org>
Reply-To: apbianco at cygnus dot com


Jeff Sturm writes:

> hmm... I didn't see a regression, but then I'm getting many testsuite
> failures for unrelated reasons.

-ffile-list? Tom has a patch, I don't think it's in yet. Tom, I
verified it fixes the `make check' problem. You should go ahead and
check this in. Otherwise:

  http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2001-07/msg00840.html

> Under what circumstances are there hidden args?  Do you have a test case?

Appended to my previous reply.

./A

Follow-Ups:
- Re: PATCH: java: suppress java.lang.Object constructor
  - From: Tom Tromey

References:
- Re: PATCH: java: suppress java.lang.Object constructor
  - From: Alexandre Petit-Bianco
- Re: PATCH: java: suppress java.lang.Object constructor
  - From: Jeff Sturm

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]