Re: PATCH: fix buffer overrun in natFile.cc

[Jeff Sturm <jsturm at one-point dot com>]

On 30 May 2001, Tom Tromey wrote:
> My concern about the branch for this patch isn't whether it causes a
> regression, but instead whether it can be made portable enough,
> quickly enough.

What is "portable enough"?  As I understand it, gcj 3.0 is only supported
on Solaris and GNU/Linux right now.  I've tested those two.  (A really old
glibc might fail, but would probably lose for other reasons anyhow.)

Offhand I don't know any systems with readdir_r and without pathconf.
Also I can't easily test anything without readdir_r.  Anyone with a good
newlib-based build want to try it?  (Note that the readdir fallback should
really be protected by a mutex.  I didn't try to fix that.)

Jeff