Re: `make install` should install the info files in java

[Per Bothner <per at bothner dot com>]

Mark Mitchell <mark@codesourcery.com> writes:

> So, my current thinking is that we should a) not install fastjar, and
> b) not include it in the source tree.  That will indeed cause less
> people to install the Java compiler -- but that's not necessarily a
> bad thing, since anyone who wants to use GCJ can easily install
> fastjar first, or get a binary package.  And, we can still ask/require
> that GCC maintainers install this package so that they test the Java
> compiler.

I've sent email to the fastjat maintainer asking what he feels about
about fastjar in gcj.  No response yet - except a few mailer warnings
about not being able to deliver it yet.
-- 
	--Per Bothner
per@bothner.com   http://www.bothner.com/~per/