This is the mail archive of the gcc@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: GCC 8.5 Status Report (2020-03-04)

From: Segher Boessenkool <segher at kernel dot crashing dot org>
To: Jonathan Wakely <jwakely dot gcc at gmail dot com>
Cc: Jakub Jelinek <jakub at redhat dot com>, "H.J. Lu" <hjl dot tools at gmail dot com>, Jonathan Wakely <jwakely at redhat dot com>, GCC Development <gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org>
Date: Thu, 5 Mar 2020 09:57:44 -0600
Subject: Re: GCC 8.5 Status Report (2020-03-04)
References: <20200304100911.GL2156@tucnak> <CAMe9rOowYXK+mZWdoh9c1Urnd28NpQxpSDdVzxLoY8Nyy8rsrg@mail.gmail.com> <20200304130141.GP2156@tucnak> <CAH6eHdTQs8yrs65rvA1XMtfQc9iZVt_uXpiMPhjpSw7CFsDCFw@mail.gmail.com>

On Wed, Mar 04, 2020 at 01:45:25PM +0000, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
> On Wed, 4 Mar 2020 at 13:02, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> > The test says:
> >   // nl_NL chosen because it has no thousands separator (at this time).
> >   locale loc_it = locale(ISO_8859(15,nl_NL));
> > so no wonder that it FAILs if nl_NL now has thousands separator.
> 
> Drat. I thought we could rely on the Dutch to keep things simple,
> apparently even they want to keep changing things  ;-)

It has been like this since forever; just the locale used to be wrong.


Segher

References:
- GCC 8.5 Status Report (2020-03-04)
  - From: Jakub Jelinek
- Re: GCC 8.5 Status Report (2020-03-04)
  - From: H.J. Lu
- Re: GCC 8.5 Status Report (2020-03-04)
  - From: Jakub Jelinek
- Re: GCC 8.5 Status Report (2020-03-04)
  - From: Jonathan Wakely

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]