This is the mail archive of the
gcc@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: Second GCC 8.4 Release Candidate available from gcc.gnu.org
- From: "H.J. Lu" <hjl dot tools at gmail dot com>
- To: Jakub Jelinek <jakub at redhat dot com>
- Cc: Richard Biener <rguenther at suse dot de>, GCC Development <gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org>
- Date: Mon, 2 Mar 2020 03:59:19 -0800
- Subject: Re: Second GCC 8.4 Release Candidate available from gcc.gnu.org
- References: <20200302104550.GO2156@tucnak> <CAMe9rOprwER_c2_VfacxgtnnqUSL_OjtKQB+jtFzaRyOkLspqQ@mail.gmail.com> <20200302114628.GP2156@tucnak>
On Mon, Mar 2, 2020 at 3:46 AM Jakub Jelinek <jakub@redhat.com> wrote:
>
> On Mon, Mar 02, 2020 at 03:41:06AM -0800, H.J. Lu wrote:
> > On Mon, Mar 2, 2020 at 2:46 AM Jakub Jelinek <jakub@redhat.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > The second release candidate for GCC 8.4 is available from
> > >
> > > https://gcc.gnu.org/pub/gcc/snapshots/8.4.0-RC-20200302/
> > > ftp://gcc.gnu.org/pub/gcc/snapshots/8.4.0-RC-20200302/
> > >
> > > and shortly its mirrors. It has been generated from git commit
> > > r8-10102-g0afd41f8e6530b13421679801cf73cb6bef55553.
> > >
> > > I have so far bootstrapped and tested the release candidate on
> > > x86_64-linux and i686-linux. Please test it and report any issues to
> > > bugzilla.
> > >
> > > If all goes well, I'd still like to release 8.4 on Wednesday, March 4th.
> > >
> >
> > I'd like to backport:
> >
> > commit r10-6965-g577350603a657590c4b54a4a966cb49497e2514c
> > Author: H.J. Lu <hjl.tools@gmail.com>
> > Date: Mon Mar 2 03:08:57 2020 -0800
> >
> > lto: Also copy .note.gnu.property section
> >
> > When generating the separate file with LTO debug sections, we should
> > also copy .note.gnu.property section.
> >
> > PR lto/93966
> > * simple-object.c (handle_lto_debug_sections): Also copy
> > .note.gnu.property section.
> >
> > to GCC 8. Is it OK?
>
> Richi said on IRC that GCC 8 is unaffected and does copy all sections.
GCC 8 is affected.
> Also, I've made GCC 8.4-rc2 already and would strongly prefer not to do
> another one, so if it is needed even for GCC 8, my preference would be
> defer til 8.5 (i.e. commit after Wednesday).
I will do it for Wednesday.
--
H.J.