Re: [PATCH, v3] wwwdocs: e-mail subject lines for contributions

["Richard Earnshaw (lists)" <Richard dot Earnshaw at arm dot com>]

On 03/02/2020 15:13, Richard Earnshaw (lists) wrote:
> On 03/02/2020 14:10, Jason Merrill wrote:
> > On Mon, Feb 3, 2020 at 7:57 AM Alexander Monakov <amonakov@ispras.ru> 
> > wrote:
> >
> > > On Mon, 3 Feb 2020, Richard Earnshaw (lists) wrote:
> > >
> > > > Upper case is what glibc has, though it appears that it's a rule 
> > > > that is
> > > not
> > > > strictly followed.  If we change it, then it becomes another friction
> > > point
> > > > between developer groups.  Personally, I'd leave it as is, then turn a
> > > blind
> > > > eye to such minor non-conformance.
> > >
> > > In that case can we simply say that both 'committed' and 'COMMITTED' are
> > > okay,
> > > if we know glibc doesn't follow that rule and anticipate we will not 
> > > follow
> > > it either?
> >
> > And perhaps something shorter?  "committed" is a long word.  [PUSHED]?
> >
> > Jason
>
> "Committed" is the accepted term in glibc.  If we insist on something 
> different, then that becomes a friction point.

"COMMITTED", not "Committed".

> On the other hand, I really don't care personally as long as the meaning 
> is clear.  I'd be happy with the super-set of all of these, since it 
> only appears in email messages, not the final commit.
>
> R.