This is the mail archive of the
gcc@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: [PATCH, v3] wwwdocs: e-mail subject lines for contributions
- From: Alexander Monakov <amonakov at ispras dot ru>
- To: "Richard Earnshaw (lists)" <Richard dot Earnshaw at arm dot com>
- Cc: Gerald Pfeifer <gerald at pfeifer dot com>, gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org, GCC Development <gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org>
- Date: Mon, 3 Feb 2020 15:50:58 +0300 (MSK)
- Subject: Re: [PATCH, v3] wwwdocs: e-mail subject lines for contributions
- References: <c3928f40-2d71-fb5b-f2e0-3878ac88a2b7@arm.com> <alpine.LSU.2.21.2001191425160.739@anthias.pfeifer.com> <353faf3e-bf43-eb4d-542d-45a53dce77b2@arm.com> <ff130918-cbbb-2afc-d752-1af2ca9df340@arm.com> <91e48c52-4548-089b-707a-afd400001dac@arm.com> <1d2b74eb-842b-29a7-2abd-e2b34e12315c@arm.com> <alpine.LNX.2.20.13.2002031448190.22653@monopod.intra.ispras.ru> <e91ac427-06f0-845a-5450-09998d8d4dc6@arm.com>
On Mon, 3 Feb 2020, Richard Earnshaw (lists) wrote:
> Upper case is what glibc has, though it appears that it's a rule that is not
> strictly followed. If we change it, then it becomes another friction point
> between developer groups. Personally, I'd leave it as is, then turn a blind
> eye to such minor non-conformance.
In that case can we simply say that both 'committed' and 'COMMITTED' are okay,
if we know glibc doesn't follow that rule and anticipate we will not follow
it either?
Thanks.
Alexander