This is the mail archive of the gcc@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: Proposal for the transition timetable for the move to GIT


On 1/10/20 8:33 AM, Maxim Kuvyrkov wrote:
Joseph, please point to message on gcc@ mailing list that expresses consensus of GCC community to use reposurgeon conversion.  Otherwise, it is not appropriate to substitute one's opinion for community consensus.

I was on the fence for a long time, since I felt that the rewritten reposurgeon was still somewhat unproven. However, I think the reposurgeon conversion is probably the best choice at this point, given that an actual problem caused by the use of git-svn was demonstrated by Richard E, indicating that the scripts do not have an inherent reliability advantage. I also think Joseph has a very throrough pair of eyeballs.

I have no opinion one way or another which method should be used to identify author names, since I have not looked into that.


Bernd


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]