This is the mail archive of the gcc@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.
Indexes: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] Site Nav: [Browse other archives for this mailing list]
[Browse other mailing lists at this site]
January 31, 2020
| 22:39 | gcc-8-20200131 is now available | gccadmin |
| 22:09 | ا | سعود # |
| 07:37 | Re: Confused about code/comment in tree.c:build2 | Richard Biener |
| 04:48 | Confused about code/comment in tree.c:build2 | Bin.Cheng |
January 30, 2020
| 17:16 | Re: SSA Iterators | Nicholas Krause |
| 16:25 | Re: SSA Iterators | Richard Biener |
| 16:05 | Re: SSA Iterators | Martin Sebor |
| 14:56 | Re: [musl] musl, glibc and ideal place for __stack_chk_fail_local | Segher Boessenkool |
| 13:38 | Re: [musl] musl, glibc and ideal place for __stack_chk_fail_local | Rich Felker |
| 12:33 | Re: [musl] musl, glibc and ideal place for __stack_chk_fail_local | Segher Boessenkool |
| 10:00 | Re: SSA Iterators | Jonathan Wakely |
| 05:44 | SSA Iterators | Nicholas Krause |
January 29, 2020
| 19:12 | Re: Question about changing {machine,type} modes during LTO | Erick Ochoa |
| 09:52 | Re: fast_math_flags_set_p vs. set_fast_math_flags inconsistency? | Ulrich Weigand |
January 28, 2020
| 22:17 | Re: fast_math_flags_set_p vs. set_fast_math_flags inconsistency? | Joseph Myers |
| 17:19 | Re: fast_math_flags_set_p vs. set_fast_math_flags inconsistency? | Ulrich Weigand |
| 15:55 | Feedback on the GNU Social contract and new wiki.gnu.tools. | Carlos O'Donell |
| 09:35 | Re: Question about changing {machine,type} modes during LTO | Richard Biener |
January 27, 2020
| 22:16 | Re: GCC Multi-Threading Ideas | Eric Gallager |
| 20:20 | Re: fast_math_flags_set_p vs. set_fast_math_flags inconsistency? | Joseph Myers |
| 18:26 | Re: fast_math_flags_set_p vs. set_fast_math_flags inconsistency? | Ulrich Weigand |
| 17:41 | Question about changing {machine,type} modes during LTO | Erick Ochoa |
| 17:27 | Re: Aliasing rules for unannotated SYMBOL_REFs | Jeff Law |
| 16:09 | Re: SSA Question related to Dominator Trees | Nicholas Krause |
| 15:46 | Re: SSA Question related to Dominator Trees | Jeff Law |
| 15:30 | Re: GCC GSoC 2020: Call for mentors and project ideas | Martin Liška |
| 15:18 | SSA Question related to Dominator Trees | Nicholas Krause |
January 26, 2020
| 22:40 | gcc-10-20200126 is now available | gccadmin |
| 14:59 | Re: Git push account | Feng Xue OS |
| 05:32 | teting | michael |
January 25, 2020
| 22:40 | gcc-9-20200125 is now available | gccadmin |
| 16:18 | Re: Git push account | Jeff Law |
| 16:11 | Re: Git ChangeLog policy for GCC Testsuite inquiry | Jeff Law |
| 15:54 | Re: [musl] musl, glibc and ideal place for __stack_chk_fail_local | Rich Felker |
| 15:50 | Re: Git ChangeLog policy for GCC Testsuite inquiry | Nathan Sidwell |
| 14:31 | Re: Git push account | Feng Xue OS |
| 14:07 | Re: Git push account | Andreas Schwab |
| 12:39 | Git push account | Feng Xue OS |
| 10:53 | musl, glibc and ideal place for __stack_chk_fail_local | Sergei Trofimovich |
| 09:31 | Aliasing rules for unannotated SYMBOL_REFs | Richard Sandiford |
January 24, 2020
January 23, 2020
January 22, 2020
January 21, 2020
January 20, 2020
| 19:27 | GCC Multi-Threading Ideas | Nicholas Krause |
| 18:50 | Re: fast_math_flags_set_p vs. set_fast_math_flags inconsistency? | Joseph Myers |
| 18:42 | fast_math_flags_set_p vs. set_fast_math_flags inconsistency? | Ulrich Weigand |
| 17:51 | Re: Updating "regression hunting" to the Git world (was: [wwwdocs] Adjustments of "regression hunting" instructions to the post-SVN world.) | Gerald Pfeifer |
| 16:27 | Re: Let's remove all (or the largest) diffs from gcc-cvs@ | Joseph Myers |
| 14:50 | Re: Updating "regression hunting" to the Git world (was: [wwwdocs] Adjustments of "regression hunting" instructions to the post-SVN world.) | Jonathan Wakely |
| 14:13 | Re: gcc-cvs mails for personal/vendor branches for merge commits | Segher Boessenkool |
| 12:27 | Quota exceeded | Server |
| 11:21 | Re: [wwwdocs] Generalize instructions and remove notes on repository mirroring via rsync. | Joseph Myers |
| 07:58 | Re: GCC 10: Add driver options -mbranches-within-32B-boundaries and -malign-branch* for x86 | Richard Biener |
January 19, 2020
| 22:40 | gcc-10-20200119 is now available | gccadmin |
| 14:10 | Re: New redirects for git | Gerald Pfeifer |
| 13:07 | Updating "regression hunting" to the Git world (was: [wwwdocs] Adjustments of "regression hunting" instructions to the post-SVN world.) | Gerald Pfeifer |
January 18, 2020
| 22:39 | gcc-9-20200118 is now available | gccadmin |
| 22:04 | Re: gcc-cvs mails for personal/vendor branches for merge commits | Julien "_FrnchFrgg_" Rivaud |
| 17:49 | Re: gcc-cvs mails for personal/vendor branches for merge commits | Segher Boessenkool |
| 14:51 | Do you need positive website reviews to grow your business??? | Reviews Provider's |
| 14:30 | Let's remove all (or the largest) diffs from gcc-cvs@ | Hans-Peter Nilsson |
| 11:07 | Re: [wwwdocs] Generalize instructions and remove notes on repository mirroring via rsync. | Gerald Pfeifer |
| 09:50 | Re: git conversion in progress | Andreas Schwab |
January 17, 2020
January 16, 2020
January 15, 2020
January 14, 2020
January 13, 2020
January 12, 2020
| 22:11 | Re: GIT: Monotonically increasing trunk and release branch ids | Jakub Jelinek |
| 18:09 | Rebasing local git branches on the new repo | Jonathan Wakely |
| 12:17 | Hello Dear, Urgent Respond Needed | Mr. Cho J |
January 11, 2020
January 10, 2020
January 09, 2020
January 08, 2020
| 23:34 | Re: Proposal for the transition timetable for the move to GIT | Joseph Myers |
| 22:11 | Re: Proposal for the transition timetable for the move to GIT | Eric S. Raymond |
| 20:46 | Re: Proposal for the transition timetable for the move to GIT | Maxim Kuvyrkov |
| 18:52 | [INTERNAL] LLVM v9.0.1 | Rogerio de Souza Moraes |
| 13:52 | Re: Frontend access to target-related options | The Other |
| 10:04 | Re: Frontend access to target-related options | Andrew Pinski |
| 09:16 | __patchable_function_entries is flawed | Fangrui Song |
| 09:12 | Re: Frontend access to target-related options | The Other |
| 08:57 | Weekly Notice-AICSE2020 Invite Papers for Pub.(Ei|CPCI|SCOPUS) | Dani |
January 07, 2020
January 06, 2020
January 05, 2020
| 22:41 | gcc-10-20200105 is now available | gccadmin |
| 20:28 | Support Library Requirements for GCC 10 | Bruno Haible |
| 15:34 | Re: Could I obtain the forms needed to make a contribution? | Moritz Strübe |
January 04, 2020
| 23:51 | Re: New GCC mirror from Rabat, Morocco | Gerald Pfeifer |
| 23:41 | Re: http://www.netgull.com mirror broken | Gerald Pfeifer |
| 22:40 | gcc-9-20200104 is now available | gccadmin |
| 20:48 | -fpatchable-function-entry: leverage multi-byte NOP on x86 | Fangrui Song |
| 02:23 | Re: Could I obtain the forms needed to make a contribution? | Eric Curtin |
| 00:05 | Re: [EXT] Re: Mechanism to get at function information seems not to work | Gary Oblock |
January 03, 2020
| 23:52 | Re: Mechanism to get at function information seems not to work | David Malcolm |
| 23:02 | Mechanism to get at function information seems not to work | Gary Oblock |
| 22:40 | gcc-8-20200103 is now available | gccadmin |
| 16:09 | Re: Question about sizeof after struct change | Erick Ochoa |
| 12:38 | Re: Test GCC conversion with reposurgeon available | Joseph Myers |
| 07:47 | Re: Information on Loop Blocking | Richard Biener |
| 01:04 | Information on Loop Blocking | Gary Oblock |
January 02, 2020
| 22:03 | Re: Fixing gcc git logs | Jonathan Wakely |
| 16:54 | Re: Frontend access to target-related options | Nathan Sidwell |
| 13:26 | Re: Fixing gcc git logs | Toon Moene |
| 10:58 | Re: Proposal for the transition timetable for the move to GIT | Richard Earnshaw (lists) |
| 10:49 | Re: Fixing gcc git logs | Richard Earnshaw |
| 09:34 | Re: Fixing gcc git logs | Janne Blomqvist |
| 02:59 | Re: Proposal for the transition timetable for the move to GIT | Alexandre Oliva |
| 02:00 | Fixing gcc git logs | Jerry |
January 01, 2020
| 15:20 | Re: Does gcc automatically lower optimization level for very large routines? | Segher Boessenkool |
| 09:32 | Frontend access to target-related options | The Other |
| 05:25 | Re: Does gcc automatically lower optimization level for very large routines? | Andi Kleen |
Indexes: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] Site Nav: [Browse other archives for this mailing list]
[Browse other mailing lists at this site]