Re: Commit messages and the move to git

[Jonathan Wakely <jwakely dot gcc at gmail dot com>]

On Thu, 19 Dec 2019 at 15:49, Joseph Myers <joseph@codesourcery.com> wrote:
>
> On Thu, 19 Dec 2019, Richard Earnshaw (lists) wrote:
>
> > > Done. https://gitlab.com/esr/gcc-conversion/merge_requests/25 fixes
> > > (most of?) the most egregious ones, like fortran fixes with c++ PR
> > > numbers and vice versa. Jakub and I have several whitelist commits
> > > too, but I think they're all less critical (as mentioned previously,
> > > most of them are unimportant differences like rtl-optimization vs
> > > tree-optimization, or debug vs lto, or simply that  the Bugzilla
> > > component has been changed since the commit was done and the commit
> > > was actually right at the time).
> > >
> >
> > Merged
>
> And I've fixed up some Python syntax there (commas that needed to be
> colons, between the commit number and the fixup information).

Thanks.

I'm afraid it was too mind-numbing to just work through the list from
bottom to top. Jakub and I found some problems and some that can be
whitelisted. I submitted another merge request.

I've attached an updated list to this mail, which removes the items
we've analysed. There are 531 remaining.

Attachment: tocheck2.txt
Description: Text document