This is the mail archive of the gcc@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: Atomics in C++11

From: Nicholas Krause <xerofoify at gmail dot com>
To: Jason Merrill <jason at redhat dot com>
Cc: gcc Mailing List <gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org>, giuliano dot belinassi at usp dot br
Date: Fri, 20 Sep 2019 16:11:49 -0400
Subject: Re: Atomics in C++11
References: <a4df2f4b-56db-0ef0-bc1a-1623ea205166@gmail.com> <CADzB+2k18BVsHGHbrZEBnpxZ-8nT7L6J7KBhRNkntkODDiBLfg@mail.gmail.com>


On 9/20/19 4:09 PM, Jason Merrill wrote:

On Fri, Sep 20, 2019 at 8:32 AM Nicholas Krause <xerofoify@gmail.com> wrote:

I was wondering if its possible to use the C11 atomics library for
multithreading

GCC. Not sure if its a good idea due to concerns about older plaforms
not having a C11 supported libraries or compiler.

I've been wondering if it's time to move to C++11 in general, since
we've had compilers with C++11 support for more than 5 years at this
point.

Jason

Jason,

It's up to the community at large but both me and the other student whois CCed

on this work would find it useful. He wants to use TLS for certainstructures and

functions to be doubled per thread for no locking e.t.c. and ease ofprogramming.



He can add his comments if need be,

Nick

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Atomics in C++11
  - From: Joel Sherrill

References:
- Atomics in C++11
  - From: Nicholas Krause
- Re: Atomics in C++11
  - From: Jason Merrill

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]