This is the mail archive of the gcc@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.
| Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
|---|---|---|
| Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |
| Other format: | [Raw text] | |
Am 25.05.19 um 15:16 schrieb Toon Moene:
On 5/25/19 2:52 PM, Thomas Koenig wrote:Hi, consider this: There is a bug, confirmed by several people. This occurs in closed-source, proprietary software, and appears to be due to one of my commits. Despite considerable help from somebody who has access to the source, and putting in quite a few (volunteer) hours myself, there is no test case. So, what to do? Close the PR as INVALID? This would be our standard policy, correct? FYI, the proprietary, closed-source software is SPEC, the corresponding PR is 90539, and the friendly helper is Martin Liska.But the problem seems to be related to netcdf (your comment #22), which is freely available (don't know off-hand which license).
I looked at the current netcdf code, and their C interface is different from what SPEC seems to use. So, it is either a an old version, or SPEC changed something for some reason, or both.
Does the problem trigger with netcdf's own test programs ?
I have never built netcdf myself. Would somebody who wants to (possibly) generate a test case then have to build 30+ versions on the off-chance of finding something?
| Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
|---|---|---|
| Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |