This is the mail archive of the gcc@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: [RFC] -Weverything

From: Thomas König <tk at tkoenig dot net>
To: Martin Sebor <msebor at gmail dot com>
Cc: Thomas Koenig <tkoenig at netcologne dot de>, gcc mailing list <gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org>, "fortran at gcc dot gnu dot org" <fortran at gcc dot gnu dot org>
Date: Wed, 23 Jan 2019 08:17:00 +0100
Subject: Re: [RFC] -Weverything
References: <80e1821d-b6da-c6b6-2bf2-29734f5fd34e@netcologne.de> <edd7d59e-0bf0-3bf7-09ba-66c241ac5f03@gmail.com>


> Am 23.01.2019 um 01:53 schrieb Martin Sebor <msebor@gmail.com>:

> I often wish GCC supported it -- not in the hopes of finding every
> conceivable bug or transgression against known coding styles but
> as a tool to discover warnings that have to be explicitly enabled
> either by using their own options or by specifying a higher level
> than the default.

So, maybe an option to list every warning would be better?

I am sure the number of people doing

gcc `gcc —list-warnings=all`

and complaining about the result be small 😉

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [RFC] -Weverything
  - From: Jakub Jelinek
- Re: [RFC] -Weverything
  - From: Jonathan Wakely

References:
- [RFC] -Weverything
  - From: Thomas Koenig
- Re: [RFC] -Weverything
  - From: Martin Sebor

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]