This is the mail archive of the
gcc@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: Selective scheduling and its usage
- From: Eric Botcazou <ebotcazou at adacore dot com>
- To: Richard Biener <richard dot guenther at gmail dot com>
- Cc: Martin Liška <mliska at suse dot cz>, GCC Development <gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org>, Alexander Monakov <amonakov at ispras dot ru>, Andrey Belevantsev <abel at ispras dot ru>, Jakub Jelinek <jakub at redhat dot com>
- Date: Thu, 29 Mar 2018 17:14:42 +0200
- Subject: Re: Selective scheduling and its usage
- References: <47107168-05ec-25b6-d2d9-be1dfcf0811e@suse.cz> <1896976.h1cWcUzf4a@polaris> <CAFiYyc31pCe78fntZzuV5wPjXUwOTMh8r4KsfdT9UGQSjc=yAw@mail.gmail.com>
> Are you suggesting we should not care about regressions with features
> that are not enabled by default or which are only exposed with
> "non-standard" flags? The current scheme on which bugs get P1/P2/P4+
> assigned is quite simple...
I'm only suggesting keeping them at P3, which is not "don't care" as far as I
know but just the default priority. The criterion could be a flag that is not
part of any -Ox switches and not enabled on any primary+secondary platforms.
--
Eric Botcazou