This is the mail archive of the
gcc@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: GCC 8.0.1 Status Report (2018-03-27)
- From: "H.J. Lu" <hjl dot tools at gmail dot com>
- To: Richard Biener <rguenther at suse dot de>
- Cc: GCC Development <gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org>, GCC Patches <gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org>
- Date: Tue, 27 Mar 2018 06:39:30 -0700
- Subject: Re: GCC 8.0.1 Status Report (2018-03-27)
- References: <alpine.LSU.2.20.1803271532110.18265@zhemvz.fhfr.qr>
On Tue, Mar 27, 2018 at 6:32 AM, Richard Biener <rguenther@suse.de> wrote:
>
> Status
> ======
>
> The GCC 8 trunk is open for regression and documentation fixes. Following
> past releases we are aiming at a first release candidate mid April though
> if you look at the quality data below that looks ambitious.
>
> So please help tackling (and confirming, bisecting, reducing, etc.)
> regressions to make a timely release of GCC 8 possible.
>
>
> Quality Data
> ============
>
> Priority # Change from last report
> -------- --- -----------------------
> P1 22 - 14
> P2 104 - 29
> P3 15 - 42
> P4 183 + 25
> P5 26 - 1
> -------- --- -----------------------
> Total P1-P3 141 - 85
> Total 350 - 61
>
>
> Previous Report
> ===============
>
> https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc/2018-01/msg00083.html
I have 3 Intel CET patches pending review:
https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2018-03/msg01356.html
https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2017-12/msg00485.html
https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2017-10/msg01741.html
I also opened:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85086
I have a patch at
https://github.com/hjl-tools/gcc/commit/e9ff815941406e38fa629947af4d809b9129e860
which requires unwind ABI extension.
I'd like to see them fixed to get working Intel CET support in
GCC 8.
Thanks.
--
H.J.