This is the mail archive of the gcc@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: How big (and fast) is going to be GCC 8?

From: Martin Liška <mliska at suse dot cz>
To: David Malcolm <dmalcolm at redhat dot com>, GCC Development <gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org>
Cc: Jan Hubicka <hubicka at ucw dot cz>, Richard Biener <richard dot guenther at gmail dot com>, Michael Matz <matz at suse dot de>, Martin Jambor <mjambor at suse dot cz>
Date: Tue, 6 Mar 2018 19:35:51 +0100
Subject: Re: How big (and fast) is going to be GCC 8?
Authentication-results: sourceware.org; auth=none
References: <6f547f38-1751-c003-b5ae-52dae776d39a@suse.cz> <1520349196.2913.66.camel@redhat.com> <e8660eb2-d0ec-fad1-9863-fe439f39bdd9@suse.cz>

On 03/06/2018 05:18 PM, Martin Liška wrote:

Yes, in bytes. Would be nicer to have it in MB ;) It would be easily
readable. I'll fix that.


Hi.

I'm sending updated binary size statistics for both cc1 and cc1plus
in MB.

Martin

Attachment: gcc-8-build-stats-v2.pdf.bz2
Description: application/bzip

Attachment: gcc-8-build-stats-v2.ods
Description: application/vnd.oasis.opendocument.spreadsheet

References:
- How big (and fast) is going to be GCC 8?
  - From: Martin Liška
- Re: How big (and fast) is going to be GCC 8?
  - From: David Malcolm
- Re: How big (and fast) is going to be GCC 8?
  - From: Martin Liška

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]