This is the mail archive of the gcc@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: Nested-Functions

From: Jonathan Wakely <jwakely dot gcc at gmail dot com>
To: nick <xerofoify at gmail dot com>
Cc: Austin T <aytasato at gmail dot com>, Alexsandr Yvarov <a dot yvarov at yandex dot ru>, "gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org" <gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org>
Date: Thu, 4 Jan 2018 09:32:29 +0000
Subject: Re: Nested-Functions
Authentication-results: sourceware.org; auth=none
References: <2834421515014004@web57j.yandex.ru> <CAH6eHdS=GLMrZgn1Z9va3MqgSBUQsW8TjEenL+iqe9Tt1PbtjQ@mail.gmail.com> <c62b1745-d4e0-c985-5903-7d88356a014e@gmail.com> <CAJhtzfB9gBiYNo6FB4QCvsNARdcSErs12oN6BVAWti0xrwh1KQ@mail.gmail.com> <CAJhtzfCLC1Nv_JYcwtEjy5hLf7tP6HJiph=5h7AM0XM7SmpRhg@mail.gmail.com> <CAJhtzfCiGoTwS2O+j0nw1EpAXZ9mhDf8XJd0u+qtKvWjiDGVFg@mail.gmail.com> <8df9b1e3-b1f3-06c9-36c0-9e6bd1546392@gmail.com>

On 4 January 2018 at 00:54, nick wrote:
>
>
> On 2018-01-03 07:52 PM, Austin T wrote:
>>  By nested functions, I'm assuming that means raw function definitions that are valid inside a temporary scope of a function. If I'm not mistaken, they're equivalent to C++ lambda expressions but just written in a syntactic sugar syntax.
>>
>> Austin
>>
>
> That's the same thing actually if your going to name your lambda. What are the advantages
> of this newer syntax or feature. Do you have any examples?

Read the docs. It's not newer, it's much older than C++ lambdas, but
is only supported in GNU C.

References:
- Nested-Functions
  - From: Alexsandr Yvarov
- Re: Nested-Functions
  - From: Jonathan Wakely
- Re: Nested-Functions
  - From: nick
- Re: Nested-Functions
  - From: Austin T
- Re: Nested-Functions
  - From: nick

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]