This is the mail archive of the gcc@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: Feature Request for C

From: "Florian Weimer via gcc" <gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org>
To: Taylor Holberton <taylorcholberton at gmail dot com>, gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org
Date: Mon, 8 May 2017 13:00:22 +0200
Subject: Re: Feature Request for C
Authentication-results: sourceware.org; auth=none
Authentication-results: ext-mx09.extmail.prod.ext.phx2.redhat.com; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=redhat.com
Authentication-results: ext-mx09.extmail.prod.ext.phx2.redhat.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=fweimer at redhat dot com
Dkim-filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 mx1.redhat.com 4068D7109A
Dmarc-filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mx1.redhat.com 4068D7109A
References: <CAEj6FjabOZFtFD7vrzFiNGKB+Wn+DjXZjDXGwibxBS_oyXNPPw@mail.gmail.com>
Reply-to: Florian Weimer <fweimer at redhat dot com>

On 05/06/2017 07:09 PM, Taylor Holberton wrote:

Except instead of using c++ style mangling, it would simply just
prepend the name of the namespace to the symbols in the file.

Would this also apply to type names and struct tags? How does itinterfere with the name resolution in the body of inline functions?

Personally, I don't think we need to duplicate more things from C++ intoC as GNU extensions. If you want C++ features, just use a C++ subset.


Florian

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]